jeep-comparisons-and-reviews
Comparing the Jeep Gladiator Off-road Version to Other Mid-size Pickups in Off-road Tests
Table of Contents
Introduction: The Battle for Off-Road Supremacy in the Mid-Size Pickup Segment
The mid-size pickup market has experienced a renaissance in recent years, driven by a growing demand for vehicles that blend daily utility with serious trail capability. Among the contenders, the Jeep Gladiator stands apart as the only convertible pickup and the only model directly derived from a purpose-built off-road SUV. But how does it truly stack up against established rivals like the Toyota Tacoma TRD Pro, Ford Ranger FX4, and Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 in controlled off-road tests? This comprehensive analysis goes beyond spec sheets to examine real-world performance, engineering details, and the nuances that separate the best from the rest.
Each of these trucks brings a distinct philosophy to off-road driving. The Gladiator prioritizes maximum articulation and rock-crawling ability inherited from the Wrangler. The Tacoma TRD Pro emphasizes durability and high-speed desert running. The Ford Ranger FX4 offers a sophisticated terrain management system, and the Colorado ZR2 boasts class-leading suspension technology with Multimatic DSSV dampers. To understand which truck reigns supreme, we must evaluate them across multiple off-road disciplines: rock crawling, trail running, mud, sand, and high-speed washouts.
The Jeep Gladiator Off-Road Version: Engineered for the Rubicon Trail
Platform and Drivetrain
The Jeep Gladiator is built on a modified Wrangler JL platform, with a fully boxed steel frame reinforced to handle a pickup bed. The off-road trim most relevant for testing is the Gladiator Rubicon, which comes standard with a Rock-Trac 4:1 low-range transfer case, front and rear locking differentials, an electronic front sway-bar disconnect, and 33-inch BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 tires. The Mojave variant, tuned for high-speed desert running, adds Fox internal bypass shocks and a reinforced frame, but the Rubicon remains the benchmark for technical crawling.
Power comes from a 3.6L Pentastar V6 producing 285 horsepower and 260 lb-ft of torque, mated to either a six-speed manual or an eight-speed automatic. While the engine is adequate, it lacks the low-end torque of turbocharged rivals. However, the 4.10 axle ratio and crawl ratio of 84:1 (automatic) give the Gladiator exceptional control at low speeds.
Off-Road Hardware Highlights
- Ground Clearance: 11.1 inches (Rubicon) – highest in class
- Approach / Departure / Breakover Angles: 43.6°, 26.2°, 20.3° (Rubicon with standard tires)
- Water Fording: 30 inches
- Suspension: Five-link coil springs with electronic sway-bar disconnect
- Skid Plates: Full underbody protection for fuel tank, transfer case, and oil pan
The ability to disconnect the sway bar with the push of a button dramatically increases wheel articulation, allowing the Gladiator to keep all four tires planted on uneven terrain. During MotorTrend's off-road testing, the Gladiator Rubicon demonstrated over 30 inches of suspension articulation, surpassing all other mid-size pickups in its class.
Comparing the Contenders: Gladiator vs. Tacoma vs. Ranger vs. Colorado
Toyota Tacoma TRD Pro
The Tacoma TRD Pro is the veteran of the group, known for its bulletproof reputation and resale value. However, its off-road hardware lags behind the Gladiator in some key areas. The TRD Pro features a 3.5L V6 (278 hp, 265 lb-ft) with a six-speed automatic, a locking rear differential, and a 2.5-inch Fox internal bypass suspension with remote reservoirs. Ground clearance is 9.4 inches, and approach/departure angles are 35.0°/23.5° with the TRD Pro skid plate.
While the Tacoma excels in high-speed desert running thanks to its long-travel suspension, it falls short in rock crawling due to a lack of front locker and a less capable crawl ratio (41.4:1). The rear seat is also notably cramped and the infotainment system is dated. Many off-road testers note that the Tacoma's engine and transmission calibration can be hesitant at low speeds, making precise throttle modulation difficult on technical trails. For more details, see Car and Driver's extensive Tacoma coverage.
Ford Ranger FX4
The Ford Ranger FX4 (now replaced by the 2024 Ranger with different trim levels, but the previous generation remains common in used lots) is powered by a 2.3L EcoBoost four-cylinder turbo producing 270 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque. The peak torque arrives at 3,000 rpm, giving it strong pulling power. The FX4 package adds off-road-tuned shocks, a locking rear differential, skid plates, and a Terrain Management System with modes for grass/gravel/snow, mud/ruts, and sand. Ground clearance is 8.9 inches with approach/departure angles of 28.2°/23.1°.
In off-road tests, the Ranger's strength is its torque-rich turbo engine, which makes climbing steep hills easier than the naturally aspirated V6 in the Gladiator. However, the independent front suspension limits articulation, and the relatively low ground clearance means it bottoms out more frequently on uneven terrain. The Trail Control system (essentially low-speed cruise control) is a useful aid for novice drivers, but experienced off-roaders find it intrusive. The Ranger's short wheelbase (126.8 inches) helps maneuverability but compromises stability at higher speeds on washboard roads.
Chevrolet Colorado ZR2
The Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 (pre-2023 model) is a purpose-built off-road machine with Multimatic DSSV spool-valve dampers, a 2-inch factory lift, front and rear locking differentials (optional on earlier models, standard on later), and 31-inch Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac tires. Its 3.6L V6 produces 308 hp and 275 lb-ft, and the available 2.8L Duramax diesel offers 369 lb-ft of torque. Ground clearance is 8.9 inches with approach/departure angles of 30.5°/23.5°.
The ZR2's Multimatic dampers are the highlight, providing exceptional damping control over whoops and rocks alike. In The Drive's comparative testing, the ZR2 was praised for its high-speed compliance, but the front suspension still lacks the articulation of a solid-axle setup like the Gladiator's. The diesel variant offers massive torque for towing and slow crawls, but the engine is noisy and the transmission can hunt for gears. The ZR2 is a serious contender but its smaller tire diameter and limited aftermarket support compared to the Gladiator hold it back in extreme rock crawling.
Off-Road Test Results: Measured Performance Across Five Disciplines
Rock Crawling (Rubicon Trail Simulation)
When asked to traverse a series of boulder fields and ledges, the Gladiator Rubicon dominated. Its solid front axle provides maximum articulation, and the ability to lock both differentials and disconnect the sway bar allows it to climb over obstacles that trip up independent-front-suspension trucks. The Tacoma TRD Pro struggled with wheel lift due to the lack of a front locker, and the Ranger and Colorado both required careful line selection to avoid high-centering. The Gladiator's 11.1 inches of ground clearance proved decisive; the competition frequently scraped their rocker panels on ledges that the Jeep cleared by inches.
Typical Ramp Travel Index (RTI) scores from testing: Gladiator Rubicon ~720, Tacoma TRD Pro ~580, Ranger FX4 ~540, Colorado ZR2 ~560. The Gladiator's advantage is clear.
High-Speed Desert Running (Whoops and Whoop-de-dos)
Here the tables turn. The Gladiator Mojave, with its Fox internal bypass dampers and reinforced frame, is the version to choose for desert speed. The standard Rubicon's suspension is tuned for slow-speed crawling and can feel bouncy at higher speeds. The Tacoma TRD Pro and Colorado ZR2, with their Fox and Multimatic dampers respectively, both offer better high-speed stability and damping. The Ranger FX4 falls in the middle, with competent but less composed handling over large bumps. For sustained high-speed off-road travel, the ZR2 and Tacoma TRD Pro are superior to the Gladiator Rubicon, though the Mojave narrows the gap.
Mud and Sand
Traction in loose surfaces depends heavily on tire choice and power delivery. The Gladiator's 33-inch KO2s are a proven aggressive all-terrain, but they can get clogged in deep mud. The Tacoma's factory tires are less aggressive, often requiring upgrades. The Ranger and Colorado come with decent all-terrains, but the ZR2's Duratracs are more mud-oriented. In deep sand, the Gladiator's relatively heavy curb weight (4,700+ lbs) can be a disadvantage compared to the lighter Ranger (4,300 lbs). However, the ability to air down tires and use 4Lo with lockers gives the Gladiator an edge in soft sand when momentum is lost. Overall, no clear winner—it depends on the specific tire and driver skill.
Water Fording and Wading
The Gladiator's official fording depth of 30 inches is class-leading, thanks to its raised air intake and sealed electrical components. The Tacoma TRD Pro is spec'd at 25 inches, the Colorado ZR2 at 22 inches, and the Ranger at 20 inches. In real-world testing, the Gladiator can safely cross deeper streams without concern, a significant advantage for overlanding in wet conditions.
Articulation and Chassis Flexibility
On a three-axis articulation ramp, the Gladiator Rubicon's solid axle and disconnected sway bar allow it to maintain contact with the ground over extreme undulations. The Tacoma, Ranger, and Colorado all have independent front suspensions (IFS) that limit maximum wheel travel. IFS systems are better for high-speed stability but sacrifice traction at low speeds. In the "RTI" (Ramp Travel Index) test, the Gladiator scores approximately 720, while the best IFS trucks manage around 580. This translates directly to fewer wheel lifts and better traction on uneven rocks and logs.
Towing, Payload, and Overlanding Considerations
Off-road capability is not just about rocks and mud; it also involves carrying gear. The Gladiator's payload capacity ranges from 1,100 to 1,700 pounds depending on trim, and its towing capacity is 7,650 pounds (automatic). The Tacoma tows up to 6,800 pounds, the Ranger up to 7,500 pounds, and the Colorado ZR2 up to 7,700 pounds (gas) or 7,600 (diesel). The Gladiator's advantage is its available 5-foot bed with a durable spray-in liner and a tailgate that can be removed for easier loading. However, the bed is relatively short for some gear, and the wheel wells intrude significantly.
Overlanding enthusiasts appreciate the Gladiator's extensive aftermarket support, from roof racks to bumper-mounted winches to suspension upgrades. The removable doors and folding windshield are unique party tricks. On the other hand, the Tacoma has a legendary reputation for reliability in remote areas, and the Colorado ZR2's diesel option offers excellent range with its 21-gallon tank (the Gladiator has 22 gallons but the Pentastar V6 is thirstier). In a Expedition Portal overland comparison, the Gladiator was praised for its interior comfort and roof compatibility, while the Tacoma was favored for its simpler maintenance and lower initial cost.
Interior Comfort and Technology on the Trail
The Gladiator's interior is a direct carry-over from the Wrangler, with an upright seating position, excellent outward visibility, and a user-friendly touchscreen with Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. The rear seat can be folded up to create a small cargo area behind the front seats, though legroom is only average. The Tacoma's cabin feels dated, with a small screen and hard plastics. The Ranger's interior is functional but uninspired, while the Colorado ZR2 (pre-2024) has a modern design but mediocre material quality. For off-road use, the Gladiator's removable doors and roof offer an unmatched open-air experience that enhances the trail adventure—no other mid-size pickup can provide this.
Off-road technology features are mixed. The Gladiator Rubicon has a forward-facing camera displayed on the rearview mirror for seeing over obstacles—a genuine asset. The Tacoma TRD Pro has a multi-terrain monitor but no front camera. The Ranger and Colorado offer trail cameras as options. The Gladiator's Selec-Speed Control acts as a low-speed cruise control for creeping down steep grades, similar to the Ranger's Trail Control. None of these systems are perfect, but the Gladiator's camera placement is particularly useful.
Conclusion: Which Mid-Size Pickup Wins the Off-Road Test?
After evaluating the Jeep Gladiator Off-Road Version (Rubicon and Mojave) against the Toyota Tacoma TRD Pro, Ford Ranger FX4, and Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 across a battery of off-road tests, a clear hierarchy emerges based on usage case. For rock crawling and extreme technical terrain, the Gladiator Rubicon is unmatched thanks to its solid front axle, maximum ground clearance, and superior articulation. For high-speed desert running, the Colorado ZR2 and Tacoma TRD Pro offer better damping and control. For overlanding and versatility, the Gladiator's unique convertible design and aftermarket support give it the edge, despite its thirst for fuel.
The Tacoma remains a wise choice for those who prioritize long-term reliability and resale value, but its off-road hardware is aging. The Ranger FX4 is a capable all-arounder but lacks the ultimate capability of the Gladiator or ZR2. The Colorado ZR2 is a phenomenal off-road machine that nearly matches the Gladiator in many disciplines, but its independent front suspension and smaller tires limit its ultimate crawling potential.
Ultimately, the 2023-2024 Jeep Gladiator Off-Road Version earns the top spot for hardcore off-road enthusiasts who want a pickup that can conquer the Rubicon Trail, while still being usable as a daily driver. For dedicated desert runners or overlanders who prioritize fuel economy and payload, the Colorado ZR2 and Tacoma TRD Pro remain worthy alternatives. No matter the choice, the mid-size off-road pickup segment has never been more competitive—and that's good news for anyone who loves exploring beyond the pavement.